Frugal Design Thinking: Students Craft STEAM Makerspace Project using the Frugal Education Cards

I’m always excited to share stories that showcase frugal education practice in action, and today, I’m delighted to bring you an inspiring tale from a group of masters students at the Asian University for Women in Chittagong, Bangladesh that used the frugal education cards in a Design Thinking module to transform their STEAM Makerspace lab project.

The Asian University for Women Master of Arts in Education graduate programme is a humanitarian crisis response established in 2021 with the aspiration to empower women in tertiary education, particularly the brightest female reformists and educational entrepreneurs dedicated to creating an impact through educational development and leadership. The ‘Design Thinking’ module is foundational within the programme and is taken by students in their first year of study. Now in its third year, there are currently 25 students enrolled, many of whom are from Afghanistan.

Throughout this post there are quotes from a participating student group exploring how the cards were used to spark extraordinary ideas and foster meaningful learning experiences. This journey demonstrates how frugal education aspects can reshape educational spaces, particularly in underprivileged communities. Thank you to Hanan and her team for their generous and valuable insights.


During the design thinking class, students work in teams to pick an educational challenge related to technology, sustainability, equity or innovative pedagogy. During the design thinking module, students conduct research on their problem, gather data through interviews and observations, develop ideas, seek feedback, improve, iterate and, finally, prototype and present a solution as a model that is engaging to a broader audience. The frugal education cards were handed out to students in the earlier stages of ideation with the intent to focus the design teams on sustainability and open educational resources.

“Our teacher introduced the Frugal Education Action Cards to us in our Design Thinking class, and let me tell you, they were a game-changer! Using them in class physically sparked a ton of creative thinking!

Masters students taking part in the Design Thinking class.

The teacher printed out sets of the Frugal Education cards, providing a deck for each group. The students then used the cards in their group discussions, and engaged in a brief reflection. Other ideation techniques such as the SPRINT Crazy 8s activity, 6 thinking hats, and SCAMPER were likewise introduced as part of the class. Again, the goal is to equip students with a versatile set of tools and skills for problem solving. The expectation is not that every method needs to resonate with every project team. Instead, different groups appropriate and adapt different concepts and methods for their own purposes. 

In the early stages of brainstorming ideas for our STEAM Makerspace lab, we knew we wanted to be resourceful. We needed a way to design a space that elevated creativity and learning but also kept costs in check as it is primarily aimed at underprivileged communities. We had a wealth of data on different aspects we could incorporate into the Makerspace, but prioritizing them felt overwhelming. That’s where the frugal cards came in – a perfect fit for our project! We spread them out on a table, each team member grabbing a card and pondering its connection to our vision.”

“For instance, the ‘Upcycle’ card sparked immediate ideas. We envisioned a Makerspace that not only encouraged students to upcycle materials in their projects but also embraced this philosophy in its very construction! Upcycled materials became part of the prototype itself. We transformed toilet paper rolls into miniature recycling bins. Fun fact: The clay oven in our prototype was crafted from a used Baklava box.”

“Another card, ‘Fit for Purpose’, made us consider the lab’s adaptability to the surrounding community. So, imagine a Makerspace in a district known for its clothing industry. Instead of a traditional woodworking section, we could introduce a retail manufacturing area where students learn skills relevant to getting jobs in local businesses.

Our brainstorming process was all about free thinking. We didn’t have a structured method or process. We spread out the frugal cards, cut up the printed sheets, and sorted them by colour – all while letting our minds wander and explore different ideas and possibilities. Once everyone had explored their chosen cards, we came together for a group discussion. We talked about which cards resonated most with our design goals and how they could work together.”

“By physically arranging the cards in order of priority, we were able to narrow down our focus on specific aspects of frugal education that would shape our Makerspace. This exercise helped us create a more targeted and effective design, making the lab not just innovative, but also budget-conscious. 😃 So, we’re very grateful to Stefanie for introducing us to your work. 🙏

The cards being colourful helped a lot. Many of us are visual learners, and the colours helped us grasp the concepts. Looking ahead, I was wondering if there could be potential for an adaptable game using the action cards. This idea sparked from my upcoming design thinking session with a school here in Chittagong (grades 5 to 8). I’m hoping to use the cards and incorporate a short game to jumpstart the students’ creativity.”


This project highlights how innovative and cost-effective strategies can foster creativity and learning. By leveraging the frugal cards, the students brainstormed and implemented resourceful ideas, transforming everyday materials into educational tools. This hands-on approach not only enhanced their design process but also provided valuable insights into creating impactful and budget-conscious educational environments.

The 2024 cohort of students will collaboratively write an e-book next semester. The tentative topic is ‘Teachers as Designers – Education as Empowerment.’ Each group will contribute a chapter in their design thinking project, and also work on other chapter topics, forming an authoring team that can pursue various interests under the umbrella theme of ‘Design and Empowerment’. It also uses a frugal tool: EdTech Books.

I’d like to thank Hanan and the rest of her team for sharing their insights, your approach to the cards and the ideas you created are very inspiring, I look forward to hearing about your future experiments with them! And thanks to Stefanie Panke, the brains behind this fantastic design thinking module, who introduced the students to the frugal cards and provided valuable background into the class.

I was also fortunate enough to be interviewed by Stefanie in a recent blog post for the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) Review. You can read more of her insightful posts and interviews here.

References:

Jackson, C., de Beer, J., & White, L. (2020). The affective affordances of frugal science using foldscopes during a life sciences water quality practical. Perspectives in Education, 38(1), 224–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/PIE.V38I1.16
Rao, B. C. (2013). How disruptive is frugal? Technology in Society, 35(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.03.003
Frugal innovators strive to create products  and services that score high on three, seemingly contradictory, attributes that are  increasingly valued by Western customers: affordability, quality and  sustainability. (n.d.).
Levänen, J., Hossain, M., Lyytinen, T., Hyvärinen, A., Numminen, S., & Halme, M. (2015). Implications of Frugal Innovations on Sustainable Development: Evaluating Water and Energy Innovations. Sustainability, 8(1)(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010004
Albert, M. (2019). Sustainable frugal innovation - The connection between frugal innovation and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117747
Toyin Ojo, O., Dorasamy, M., W. Migin, M., Jayabalan, J., R, R., & Tung, S. S. (2022). Academic entrepreneurial engagement for frugal innovation in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. F1000Research, 10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73312.2
Bhatti, Y. A. (2012). What is Frugal, What is Innovation? Towards a Theory of Frugal Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2005910
Reuge, N., Jenkins, R., Brossard, M., Soobrayan, B., Mizunoya, S., Ackers, J., Jones, L., & Taulo, W. G. (2021). Education response to COVID 19 pandemic, a special issue proposed by UNICEF: Editorial review. International Journal of Educational Development, 87, 102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102485
Onyema, E. M., Eucheria, N. C., Obafemi, F. A., Sen, S., Atonye, F. G., Sharma, A., & Alsayed, A. O. (2020). Impact of Coronavirus Pandemic on Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(13), 108. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/52821
For all the hope that it excites, schooling can be rigid and bureaucratic, conservative and inflexible, resistant to new ideas and difficult to reform. That unwillingness to adapt means that education, far from delivering social mobility, can entrench social inequality. (n.d.).
The opportunities for lean and frugal innovation in education are so large because the waste of talent is so immense. That is propelling innovators and social entrepreneurs all over the developing world to find better, lower-cost ways to educate millions of people on only very modest incomes at high quality. (n.d.).
GameChangers: Playful and Gameful Education. (2022). https://gchangers.org/
Disruptive Media Learning Lab. (2022). https://dmll.org.uk/
Raworth, K. (2020). Doughnut Economics | DEAL. Doughnut Economics Action Lab. https://doughnuteconomics.org/about-doughnut-economics
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. I., Lambin, E., Lenton, T., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., … Foley, J. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232
Knapp, J. (2012, October 2). The product design sprint: A five-day recipe for startups. Medium. https://jakek.medium.com/the-product-design-sprint-a-five-day-recipe-for-startups-84fde3e97d79
$W WKLV SRLQW LQ KXPDQ KLVWRU\  WKH PRYHPHQW WKDW EHVW GHVFULEHV WKH  SURJUHVV ZH QHHG LV FRPLQJ LQWR G\QDPLF EDODQFH  E\ PRYLQJ LQWR WKH ’RXJKQXW·V VDIH DQG MXVW VSDFH  HOLPLQDWLQJ ERWK LWV VKRUWIDOO DQG RYHUVKRRW  DW WKH VDPH WLPH  7KDW FDOOV IRU D SURIRXQG VKLIW LQ RXU PHWDSKRUV  IURP  ¶JRRG LV IRUZDUG DQG XS· WR ¶JRRG LV LQ EDODQFH·. (n.d.).
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Random House.
UNESCO. (2019). UNESCO - Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER). UNESCO. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=49556&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Shah, M. A., & Santandreu Calonge, D. (2019). Frugal MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.3350
Raworth, K. (2012). A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/safe-and-just-space-humanity
Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., & Ahuja, S. (2012). Jugaad Innovation: Think Frugal, Be Flexible, Generate Breakthrough Growth. Jossey-Bass. https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Jugaad+Innovation:+Think+Frugal,+Be+Flexible,+Generate+Breakthrough+Growth-p-9781118249741
Powell, S. (n.d.). Minecraft - Saving our City from Flooding (No. 197). Retrieved April 6, 2022, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0bzg7d3
O’Neill, J. (2001). Building Better Global Economic BRICs (Global Economics Paper Volume: 66). Goldman Sachs Economic Research Group. https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/archive/building-better.html
Nelson, S. (2017). Will online courses overtake the traditional degree? British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org/voices-magazine/will-online-courses-overtake-traditional-degree
Lockridge, R. (2019). Using A Fun And Frugal Approach For Teaching 21st Century Digital Literacy Skills to Teachers. Hamline University.
Highman, L. (2017). Brexit and the Issues Facing UK Higher Education. https://www.researchcghe.org/publications/policy-briefing/brexit-and-the-issues-facing-uk-higher-education/
Fleisch, B. (2018). The Global Search For Education: Impact of Globalization on the North and South Divide [Blog]. The Edmodo Blog. https://medium.com/@edmodo_staff/the-global-search-for-education-impact-of-globalization-on-the-north-and-south-divide-c18321ac719a
Feldman, P. (2018). The potential of Education 4.0 is huge – the UK must take the lead, now. JISC. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/blog/the-potential-of-education-4-is-huge-the-uk-must-take-the-lead-now-12-sep-2018
Department for Education. (2019). Independent Panel Report: Review of Post-18 Education and Funding. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/post-18-review-of-education-and-funding-independent-panel-report
Brundtland Commission. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. https://doi.org/10.1080/07488008808408783
Bhatti, Y., Prabhu, J., & Harris, M. (2020). Frugal Innovation for Today’s and Tomorrow’s Crises. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://doi.org/10.48558/j6qk-9k57
Belfield, C., Farquharson, C., & Sibieta, L. (2018). 2018 Annual Report on Education Spending in England. Institute for Fiscal Studies. https://ifs.org.uk/publications/13306
Bekhradnia, B., & Beech, D. (2018). Demand for Higher Education to 2030. Higher Education Policy Institute. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2018/03/15/demand-higher-education-2030/
United Nations. (2019). Realizing the SDGs for All: Ensuring Inclusiveness and Equality for Every Person, Everywhere. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=30022&nr=2156&menu=3170
von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001
von Hippel, E. (2016). Free Innovation. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035217.001.0001
Radjou, N., & Prabhu, J. (2015). Frugal Innovation: How to do better with less (1st Edition). Profile Books Ltd. http://naviradjou.com/book/frugal-innovation-how-to-do-more-with-less/
Leadbeater, C. (2014). The Frugal Innovator: Creating Change on a Shoestring Budget (1st Edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137335371
Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., & Kowitz, B. (2016). Sprint: How To Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days. Simon & Schuster. https://www.thesprintbook.com
Knapp, J., & Zeratsky, J. (2018). Make Time: How to focus on what matters every day. Crown Publishing Group,. https://maketime.blog
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
Masters, A. (2019). Frugal.Education: Creative, Practical, and Sustainable Education. Frugal Education. https://frugal.education
Acaroglu, L. (2017). Tools for Systems Thinkers: The 6 Fundamental Concepts of Systems Thinking. Disruptive Design. https://medium.com/disruptive-design/tools-for-systems-thinkers-the-6-fundamental-concepts-of-systems-thinking-379cdac3dc6a
Leadbeater, C. (2010). Education innovation in the slums [Video]. TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/charles_leadbeater_education_innovation_in_the_slums
adoption of frugality entails design principles that advocate minimal use of resources for realizing efficient functioning of products. (n.d.).
Humanity has the ability to make development sustainable to ensure that it meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. (n.d.).
eate significantly more business and social value while minimising the use of diminishing resources such as energy, capital and time. I. (n.d.).
Arnab, S., Mahon, D., Masters, A., Morini, L., Minoi, J. L., & Mohamad, F. (2021). Towards the mapping of learning, playful, and frugal aspects for developing 21st century competencies and resilience. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-Based Learning, 14–24. https://www.academic-bookshop.com/ourshop/prod_7645275-ECGBL-2021-Proceedings-of-the-15th-European-Conference-on-Game-Based-Learning.html
Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018). Industry 4.0 - A Glimpse. Procedia Manufacturing, 20, 233–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034